mermaid-diagrams-apply¶

Auditiert und verdrahtet das MkDocs-Mermaid-Setup; hilft beim Hinzufügen eines Mermaid-Diagramms mit verpflichtendem Source-Marker.

Audits and applies the MkDocs Mermaid setup of the current repository against spec/project/mermaid-diagrams/<canonical_language>.md, and helps an author add a single Mermaid diagram (hand-described or derived). Wires up pymdownx.superfences, pins pymdown-extensions, refuses mkdocs-mermaid2-plugin. Picks the diagram type from the supported catalog and prepends the mandatory  marker. Audits flag missing source markers, missing direction headers, inline styling, gitGraph usage, non-English labels, and derived-source drift. Invoke when the user asks to "wire up Mermaid", "audit Mermaid setup", "draft a flowchart", or equivalent German-language requests. Don't use for general MkDocs scaffolding (use project-structure-apply), spec authoring (use spec), the docs-freshness audit (use docs-freshness-checker), or non-Mermaid diagrams. Supports resume on re-invocation per spec/claude/resumable-work/.

Plugin: nolte-shared
Phase: 3 Design (design)
Tags: scaffolding, audit
Quelle: skills/mermaid-diagrams-apply/SKILL.md

Anwenden wenn¶

you want to wire up Mermaid in MkDocs (superfences, pinned pymdown-extensions)
you want to audit the Mermaid setup against the spec
you want to draft a new flowchart or sequence diagram with the mandatory marker

Nicht anwenden wenn¶

You want general MkDocs scaffolding (not Mermaid-specific) → mkdocs-structure-apply
You want to author or audit a spec rather than a diagram → spec
You want a freshness audit across docs → docs-freshness-checker

Siehe auch¶

Referenziert von¶

Mermaid Diagrams Apply¶

Audits and repairs a repository so its MkDocs Mermaid setup, its existing diagrams, and any newly authored diagram match the Mermaid Diagrams spec at spec/project/mermaid-diagrams/<canonical_language>.md. The skill both reports findings (read-only audit) and—with explicit per-item user consent—writes the missing or fixed pieces in place.

Why this is a skill, not an agent¶

Per-block user approval is the contract: every Mermaid block emitted (or fixed) is shown to the user before it lands; the audit is read-only and the apply step is a sequence of approvals an agent's fire-and-forget shape can't carry.
Output flows back into the main conversation: the audit table, the per-finding fix proposals, and the diagram drafts surface inline so the user can redirect the type choice or the source pointer; isolating that in a structured-report boundary would obscure the per-block approval surface.
Mid-flow type selection is load-bearing: choosing between flowchart and C4Component for a portfolio map, or between sequenceDiagram and flowchart for a runtime workflow, is an interactive judgment call against the spec's catalog; that gating fits skill form, not an autonomous agent contract.
Counter-dimension considered: a narrower agent could specialize on parsing source artifacts (for example pyproject.toml → flowchart) and gain on context-window protection, but the high-impact part is the type-and-placement dialogue, not the parsing; skill wins.

When the spec isn't present in the target repository, fall back to the copy shipped by the nolte-shared plugin (read it at runtime from the plugin install path, or from the nolte/claude-shared repository). Never invent requirements that aren't in the spec.

User-language policy¶

Detect the user's language and respond in it. Generated content is split:

Mermaid block content (node labels, edge labels, identifiers, subgraph headings) is always English, even when the hosting markdown lives under docs/de/. The spec treats Mermaid fences as technical-identifier territory.
Surrounding prose (heading, lead-in sentence,  comment summary) follows the language of the markdown file the diagram is added to.
Generated config snippets (mkdocs.yml keys, docs/requirements.txt entries) are English regardless of conversation language.

Preconditions¶

Before doing anything:

Confirm the working directory is a git repository (git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree).
Locate spec/project/mermaid-diagrams/. The spec lives either in the target repo or in the nolte-shared plugin; if neither is reachable, stop and ask the user which spec source to use.
Locate mkdocs.yml at the repository root. If it's missing, stop and route the user to project-structure-apply. Setting up MkDocs from scratch is that skill's job, not this one.
Read mkdocs.yml's docs_dir (default docs/) and any configured language trees; the audit's scope is everything under that path.
Check for uncommitted changes in mkdocs.yml, docs/, and docs/requirements.txt. If the tree is dirty there, report and ask whether to stash, commit, or abort—never overwrite uncommitted work.

Operations¶

1. Setup audit¶

Walk through the spec's "MkDocs setup" requirements one item at a time and classify each as:

pass: configuration matches the spec.
missing: required key or file absent.
drift: present but diverges (wrong format, conflicting plugin, missing version specifier, etc.).

Report findings grouped under: mkdocs.yml extensions, docs/requirements.txt entries, theme, forbidden plugins. Audit is read-only—never autofix during audit.

Items to check:

markdown_extensions includes pymdownx.superfences with a custom_fences entry whose name: mermaid, class: mermaid, and format: !!python/name:pymdownx.superfences.fence_code_format.
docs/requirements.txt lists pymdown-extensions with an explicit version specifier (>=, ==, ~=, …).
theme.name is material.
plugins: doesn't contain mkdocs-mermaid2-plugin or any other Mermaid-only plugin.

2. Setup apply¶

After the audit, walk findings one at a time. For each one, propose the minimal fix and ask for confirmation before writing:

mkdocs.yml missing the Mermaid custom_fence: merge the custom_fences entry into the existing pymdownx.superfences block, or add the whole extension entry if pymdownx.superfences is absent. Preserve every other extension and key. Never replace the file wholesale.
docs/requirements.txt missing pymdown-extensions: append the entry with a Renovate-friendly minimum-version specifier (for example, pymdown-extensions>=10). Honor the "Requirements file format" rules from spec/project/project-structure/: one entry per line, no -r chains, no bare names.
mkdocs-mermaid2-plugin (or another Mermaid-only plugin) present: report it as drift and ask the user before removing—some repos may have non-spec history that needs documenting before removal.
Theme not material: report as drift and stop. Don't switch themes silently; that's a structural decision that belongs to the user, not this skill.

After every successful write, re-run only the affected check so the user sees the item flip to pass. Never batch silent writes.

3. Diagram authoring¶

Add a single Mermaid diagram to a markdown file under docs_dir. Two source modes:

user-described¶

Ask for: the conceptual structure to visualize (one or two sentences), the target markdown file path (must already exist), the diagram type from the catalog (flowchart / C4Component / classDiagram / sequenceDiagram / erDiagram).
Validate the type matches the structure: dependency / pipeline → flowchart; component / portfolio → C4Component; type-or-schema hierarchy → classDiagram; runtime workflow with actors → sequenceDiagram; data structure with cardinality → erDiagram. If the user-picked type doesn't fit, propose the catalog-fitting type and explain.
Draft the block with: heading or bold caption + one-sentence prose lead-in (in the markdown file's language),  immediately above the fence, and the Mermaid content in English.
For flowchart, default direction to LR for dependency / pipeline diagrams and TB for architecture overviews; always declare the direction explicitly on the first line.
Show the full proposed insertion to the user. Only write after explicit approval.

derived¶

Ask for: the target markdown file path, the source artifact (one of the recognized derivation sources from the spec). The source must be a real path in the repo.
Read the source artifact and extract nodes/edges:
.claude-plugin/plugin.json → plugin name, version, owner, included skills/agents → flowchart or C4Component.
pyproject.toml + requirements.txt + requirements-dev.txt → direct vs. development dependencies → flowchart LR (root → direct → development).
package.json (dependencies, devDependencies) → analogous flowchart.
.github/workflows/*.yml with _extends / uses chains into nolte/gh-plumbing → flowchart of caller-workflow → reusable-workflow at version pin.
Markdown links between specs under spec/<topic>/<slug>/<lang>.md → flowchart of cross-reference relationships.
spec/project/branching-model/ → flowchart LR with subgraph clusters for develop / main / release branches plus labeled merge / automerge edges. Never emit gitGraph: it's removed from the catalog.
Portfolio map (consumers of nolte-shared or gh-plumbing) → focused C4Component per consumer; consolidated C4Component with consumer-level subgraph blocks only inside nolte-shared and gh-plumbing themselves.
Draft the block with  above the fence; if the derivation pulls from multiple sources, list each in the comment.
Same direction-default and labeling rules as user-described.
Show the proposed insertion and the source-to-node mapping. Only write after explicit approval.

4. Diagram audit¶

Scan every markdown file under docs_dir, locate Mermaid fences (```mermaid), and report findings classified by category:

Missing source marker: no  comment on the line directly above the fence.
Missing flowchart direction: a flowchart block whose first line lacks an explicit TB / LR / TD.
Inline styling: any style, linkStyle, or classDef directive with a hard-coded color literal inside the block.
gitGraph usage: any block that starts with gitGraph. The catalog removed this type, so any occurrence is non-conformant.
Type-vs-use-case mismatch: when the surrounding heading / prose suggests one structure but the block uses another (heuristic; ask the user when unsure rather than classifying automatically).
Non-English labels: any node or edge label containing characters outside ASCII letters, digits, common punctuation, or a small allowlist (English markdown).
Derived-source drift: for any block marked derived—<path>, compare git log -1 --format=%cs -- <path> against git log -1 --format=%cs -- <markdown-file>. If the source is newer, flag drift. Surface this as a finding here even though the authoritative audit lives in the docs-freshness-checker agent.
Block size: more than ~25 nodes (SHOULD violation, not a hard block).

For each finding, propose the minimal fix and ask for confirmation. Never write without approval. For derived-drift findings, the fix is "redraft the block from the current source"—route back to operation 3's derived mode.

5. Re-audit¶

When the user has finished approving changes, re-run operations 1 and 4 end-to-end and present a fresh grouped summary. Items still missing, drift, or with an open finding must be called out so the user knows what remains and why.

Gotchas¶

pymdownx.superfences may already exist without the Mermaid custom_fence. Merge into the existing block; don't add a second pymdownx.superfences entry—MkDocs will silently use only one and the merge order is undefined.
!!python/name:pymdownx.superfences.fence_code_format is a YAML constructor tag. Some YAML loaders (notably plain yaml.safe_load) reject it. When reading mkdocs.yml, treat it as a string for the purpose of detection rather than parsing it.
Multilingual repos with i18n: when the docs use the mkdocs-static-i18n plugin in docs_structure: folder mode, the audit must walk every configured language tree, not just the default. Pull the language list from plugins.i18n.languages.
Mermaid v10+ syntax: flowchart syntax replaces the older graph keyword; emit flowchart exclusively (verify Material's bundled Mermaid version against the Material changelog if your build differs). Existing graph TB blocks discovered in the audit are drift but not breakage—Mermaid still accepts them—so propose a one-line keyword swap rather than a full rewrite.
erDiagram cardinality glyphs (||--o{, }o--||) render only when the surrounding fence has the mermaid class; they break with a generic ```text fence. The audit checks the fence header, not just the content keyword.
Trailing whitespace inside : the marker is detected by exact prefix match. A trailing space before --> doesn't break the comment but breaks naive grep-based scanners; trim before writing.
docs/requirements.txt may not exist even when MkDocs is configured—some repos rely on a pyproject.toml [project.optional-dependencies.docs] group. Ask the user where the docs install set lives before scaffolding a new docs/requirements.txt.

Examples¶

Read examples/01-wire-up-mkdocs-fresh.md when wiring Mermaid into a MkDocs project for the first time.
Read examples/02-author-flowchart-from-description.md when authoring a new flowchart diagram from a user description.
Read examples/03-audit-existing-blocks.md when auditing existing Mermaid blocks in a docs tree for spec compliance.

Resumability¶

Per spec/claude/resumable-work/, this skill is resumable: true. State is persisted to .resume/mermaid-diagrams-apply/<run-id>.yml after every successful user-approval gate and after each named phase boundary. On re-invocation, scan that directory for files with status: in_progress whose inputs: snapshot matches the current invocation; if one matches, prompt the operator with Resume run <run_id> from phase <phase> (last checkpoint <last_checkpoint_at>)? [resume / start-new / discard]. The state-file envelope (schema_version, run_id, inputs, phase, decisions[], status, ...) and the fail-closed semantics on schema or YAML errors are load-bearing in the spec; don't duplicate those rules here.

Hard rules¶

Never install or scaffold a Mermaid-only MkDocs plugin (mkdocs-mermaid2-plugin or any equivalent). Material's native superfences-based bridge is the portfolio standard, and a second plugin only duplicates the runtime.
Never write a pre-rendered SVG or PNG diagram under docs/assets/ (or any other directory) as a substitute for the Mermaid source. Rendering stays strictly client-side; the Mermaid source in markdown is the single point of truth.
Never emit inline styling (style, linkStyle, or classDef with hard-coded colors) inside a Mermaid block this skill writes.
Never emit gitGraph as a diagram type. The spec removed it from the catalog because of rendering quirks under MkDocs Material; branching diagrams use flowchart LR with subgraph clusters.
Never emit node labels, edge labels, or identifiers in any language other than English inside a Mermaid fence—not even when the hosting markdown is in docs/de/.
Never write a Mermaid block without a preceding  comment.
Never perform silent writes. Every file change requires explicit per-item user confirmation; every audit finding is presented to the user before any fix is written.
Never take on project-structure-apply work. If the audit reveals that mkdocs.yml is missing entirely, the docs tree is absent, or theme.name is something other than material, stop and route the user to project-structure-apply—don't silently scaffold those out of scope.
Never modify the spec while applying it. If a real-world need conflicts with spec/project/mermaid-diagrams/, report it and ask the user to update the spec via the nolte-shared:spec skill before proceeding.
Never edit a Mermaid block in another markdown file as a side-effect of the current operation. Each operation touches one block (or one config file) at a time, with its own approval.
Always apply a Mermaid block insertion or audit fix symmetrically to every counterpart page across every language tree configured in spec/.spec-config.yml's languages list, per spec/project/docs-multilingual-authoring/ §Authoring protocol. Mermaid sources are language-neutral (the Hard rule above already mandates English-only labels inside the fence), so the same block text is inserted at the same position in every language counterpart in the same operation; the surrounding markdown chrome that introduces or annotates the block is localised per language.

Multi-model testing¶

Examples and operations in this skill are verified on Claude Sonnet 4.6 as the default model; spot-checked on Haiku 4.5 for cost-sensitive runs; Opus 4.7 is appropriate for high-stakes audits that require deeper reasoning. The skill body has no model-specific assumptions beyond standard tool-call semantics.